Is it possible to get a band 6 in standard english

Or is everyone happy to have league tables of school rank only by subject, taking into account all bands Number of Band 6s alone is no longer an option? The second option is completely achievable, schools could be ranked within individual subjects. This would eradicate the current inaccurate comparison between subjects, but would continue to perpetuate the anxiety induced by comparison between schools.

So ultimately, do we even need to publicly publish relative performance metrics at all if they are essentially meaningless and harmful , or can we just keep these in-house to help monitor progress and improve our individual education of students? Either way, we must stop comparing subjects using the Number of Band 6s. His PhD research evaluated the impact of technology on student attainment in the sciences. Previously, Simon was a high school physics teacher for 15 years.

You are free to republish this article both online and in print. We ask that you follow some simple guidelines. Please do not edit the piece, ensure that you attribute the author, their institute, and mention that the article was originally published on EduResearch Matters.

The recent announcement by Education Minister, Simon Birmingham, of a nation-wide phonics assessment for six…. A national survey of Australian secondary school students aged between 15 and 19 years found…. Us Science teachers are becoming a rare breed in all States and Territories. Trying to inspire students to follow a career path in science in this country is becoming more difficult with restrictive, prescriptive, non-inspiring curriculum.

Hi Paul, you make some salient points. Several important decisions need to be made quickly in Australia otherwise we are going to fall further behind in terms of a STEM-skilled workforce and internationally competitive innovation. Another consequence of any lack of action will be further polarising a two-tiered education system into those schools with science-trained teachers hence science-trained students , from an ever decreasing pool, and those without.

It is not. Equity of Access to Band 6s? Raw Results and Band 6s Further confusion and anxiety reign with many schools, students and parents misunderstanding raw exam results and any correlation with performance bands.

Share This Article. Republish this article for free, online or in print, under Creative Commons licence. Republish You are free to republish this article both online and in print. By copying the HTML below, you will be adhering to all our guidelines. It stands to logic - it is simply comparing apples with oranges. Related Posts. It takes more than a great ATAR to make a great teacher The question of how to encourage the best candidates to become teachers in Australia is….

A new phonics test for Australian six year olds is a BAD idea The recent announcement by Education Minister, Simon Birmingham, of a nation-wide phonics assessment for six…. You can do it! Let us know your thoughts on the HSC exams here. YOU can help the next generation of students in the community!

JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. Why is it so hard to get a band 6 in Standard English? Thread starter nomieee Start date Mar 31, Hey Guys!! So basically I've been looking at the stats of how many people have got band 6's in Standard English and something ridiculous like 0. I was just wondering why it's so hard to get a band six in standard? Is it because of scaling? Thanks in advance. It's because the cohort's level for english standard is much lower than english advanced.

It is also well written and purposeful. Your analysis is well written and relevant. You make a judgement about the significance of the relationship between texts.

Your ideas and themes are highly insightful. You also sustain your ideas throughout your response and write purposefully. Your writing includes some consideration of your personal experience, context and thoughts. You make references to the text that relate to your thesis. However, your analysis lacks detail. You structure your ideas clearly. Your writing demonstrates a good consideration of your personal experience, context and thoughts.

Your structure demonstrates a clear and logical flow of ideas. You present a convincing response that shows a high consideration of your personal experiences, context and thoughts. Your response demonstrates that you understand the relationship between context, language, form and ideas.

You fail to incorporate the stimulus into your response where relevant. You carefully select strong textual analysis that directly supports your ideas. It is incorporated inside your response where relevant. You give purpose and explore its significance in the real world. Your writing is purposeful and insightful, and effectively evaluates the significance of the relationship between context, language, form and ideas.

You select strong, and relevant textual analysis and break it down to support your argument. Your argument is compelling and provides deep insight into the text and the wider world.

Your response follows the conventions of your chosen form. You use some figurative language to get your message across. However, it may not be strong or used appropriately. You show some consideration of your audience, purpose and form through your language and structure. However, it is still unclear. Your response is well written. Your response answers the question, but it may not be sustained or insightful.

You used an appropriate structure and language for your particular audience, purpose and form. Your use of figurative language is purposeful and conveys the message strongly. Everything works together. Your writing style and structure is purposeful and shows high consideration of your audience, purpose and form. This Advanced question gives you the choice of writing a persuasive, discursive or imaginative piece. You produce a response. You demonstrate an understanding of how language and structure is important in conveying particular messages to 1.

You produce a good response. Your use of language and structure is highly appropriate for your audience, purpose and form of writing. Your response is well written, hooks the audience in and shows personality.

You answer the question throughout your whole response. Your answer is insightful and demonstrates a high understanding of the task. You successfully manipulate your writing structure, form, figurative language… to convincingly convey a particular message.

Your control of language and structure is purposeful. You demonstrate a high consideration of your audience, purpose and form of writing.